![amd firepro w4100 vs nvidia quadro k620 amd firepro w4100 vs nvidia quadro k620](https://08.img.avito.st/640x480/6374364108.jpg)
![amd firepro w4100 vs nvidia quadro k620 amd firepro w4100 vs nvidia quadro k620](http://img.danawa.com/images/descFiles/3/775/2774058_1_1415244114.jpg)
Score on : 10,070 (higher = better performance) Intel® Xeon® Processor E3-1241 v3 (8M Cache, 3.50 GHz)ģ.5 GHz base frequency, 3.9 GHz max turbo frequency Score on : 10,073 (higher = better performance) Integrated Intel HD Graphics 4600 (which is probably useless to me because I plan to buy a graphics card with a decent GPU) Intel® Core™ i7-4790 Processor (8M Cache, up to 4.00 GHz)ģ.6 GHz base frequency, 4.0 GHz max turbo frequency What is the difference between these two processors? It looks like they are very close in terms of specs: One question: You mentioned considering Xeon E3-1241 v3 instead of the i7-4790 that I had mentioned.
![amd firepro w4100 vs nvidia quadro k620 amd firepro w4100 vs nvidia quadro k620](https://pcper.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/ddff-fx3700-3.jpg)
I'm mostly looking at processors with 4 cores / 8 threads. I will mostly be doing simulations/calculations using MATLAB, Mathematica, and Fortran and C++. I really appreciate all the help, especially the sample configurations. Electronics Engineering Technician for the Canadian Department of National Defence Electronics & Computer Engineering Technologist (Diploma + Advanced Diploma)
![amd firepro w4100 vs nvidia quadro k620 amd firepro w4100 vs nvidia quadro k620](https://www.notebookcheck.net/fileadmin/Notebooks/News/_nc3/TongaMXM_678x452.jpg)
What form of scientific simulation are you doing? What program(s) will you be using?ĭepending on the scenario, you may just need a high core / thread count processor, and LOTS of ECC Memory (i.e.
#Amd firepro w4100 vs nvidia quadro k620 series
The GT620 will be hard to find as a stand-alone product, since the GeForce 600 series has already been replaced by TWO of its successor generations (700 series, and now, the 900 series). Plus, it is completely illogical to purchase a $5,000 workstation graphics card to play games when the $400 ~ $500 gaming brethren can do just as well, or better. A workstation graphics cards needs to perform precise calculations, where a "gaming" graphics card is only concerned about spitting out the most FPS out as possible - lowest priority on errors.Ī workstation graphics card will be able to play games, and vise-versa, but it won't perform as well as compared to its suitable counter-part. If you have the option, you are better off to drop the i7-4790 to an i5 (or even i3) alternative, and spend the extra $150~$200 on better performing graphics card, such as:Ī Workstation graphics card is targeted for the use of rendering (i.e. This can directly apply to computer systems.Įven IF you have a 18-core Processor, and 256GB of RAM.if your graphics card is slow / weak in compute performance, your system is only as fast as the GPU can perform.Īn analogy is to strap a V10 engine into a car.but the transmission is only 3-speed.īoth the GT 620 and Quadro K420 are entry-level graphics cards. "You are only as strong as your weakest link."